How's my running gait? |
Picture A- Injured runner with CPD and right hip adduction |
The referenced study (Bramah et al, 2018) investigated and identified certain faulty running gait patterns that contribute to running injuries. In all, 108 runners were studied, including 72 injured runners and 36 healthy runners in the control group matched for age, height and weight.
None of the injured runners received any prior treatment for their injury. Those with an increase with more than 30 percent in training volume were also excluded from the study. The control group of runners ran at least 30 miles (or 48 km) a week.
The injuries the injured runners had were patella femoral pain (PFP), Iliotibial Band Syndrome (ITBS), Medial Tibial Stress Syndrome (MTSS or shin splints) and Achilles Tendinopathy (AT). The injuries were selected as they are most prevalent among runners.
All the injured runners showed a greater contralateral (or opposite) pelvic drop (CPD), demonstrating Gluteus Medius muscle weakness. They had a more extended knee and dorsiflexed ankle (heel striking) at initial contact and a forward trunk lean at the midstance phase of running. These patterns were consistent across each of the four injured groups.
Contralateral pelvic drop |
Injured runner (L) heel striking, forward trunk lean vs normal |
Those with a forward trunk lean may have weakness around the back and gluteal muscles as shown by previous studies. The injured runners with PFP and ITB problems had more hip adduction than other runners. More female runners were also found to more hip adduction compared to male runners.
So make sure your Gluteus Medius muscles are strong enough so that you will be less likely to have a running injury.
References
Bramah C, Preece SJ Nimh G et al (2018). Is There A Pathological Gait Associated With Common Soft Tissue Running Injuries? AJSM. 46(12): 3023-3031. DOI: 10.1177/0363546518793657
Lessi GC, Dos Santos AF et al (2017). Effects Of Fatigue On Lower Limb, Pelvis And Trunk Kinematics And Muscle Activation. J Electrom Kinesiol. 32: 9-14
No comments:
Post a Comment