X-ray Based Diagnosis Leads To Potientially Unnecessary Surgery

Picture by Balint Botz from Radiopaedia

I've written previously that many patients had back surgery when a doctor sends them for an MRI within the first 6 weeks of an initial visit.

Well, guess what? Taking an X-ray to diagnose knee arthritis may make you more likely to consider potentially unnecessary surgery (Lawford et al, 2025) as well.

Many of my patients who go to a doctor or surgeon for their knee pain end up being sent for an X-ray or even an knee MRI. Many of these patients have osteoarthritis (OA) in their knees. Actually, routine X-rays may not be necessary to diagnose the condition. A skilled and thorough assessment based on symptoms and medical history is good enough to make the diagnosis. 

A huge and common misconception is that OA is caused by 'wear and tear'. Research clearly shows that the structural changes seen in a joint X-ray does NOT correspond with the level of pain or disability a person feels. Nor can X-rays predict how symptoms will change.

In fact, X-rays are NOT recommended in Australia to diagnose knee OA. Nearly half of new patients there with knee OA get sent for a knee X-ray and cost their health system A$104.7 million each year.

Researchers in Australia showed that using X-rays to diagnose knee OA can affect how a person thinks about their knee pain and prompt them to consider potentially unnecessary knee replacement surgery.

Many patients with 'terrible' X-rays have no pain while patients with no damage on X-ray have a lot of knee pain. Hence, X-rays are not recommended for diagnosing knee OA or guiding treatment decisions.

The Australian study had 617 subjects across Australia who were randomly assigned to watch one of three videos. Each video showed a hypothetical consultation with a general practitioner (GP) about knee pain. 

The first group received a clinical diagnosis of knee OA based on their age and symptoms and were not sent for an X-ray. The other 2 groups had X-rays done to determine their diagnoses (the doctor showed one group thier X-ray images but not the other group). After watching their assigned video, the subjects completed a survey of their beliefs about OA management.

The results showed that the group who received an X-ray based on their diagnosis and were shown their images had a 36 percent higher perceived need for knee replacement surgery compared to those who received a clinical diagnosis without X-ray.

What was worse was, they even believed that exercise and physical activity could be harmful to their joint. They were also worried about their condition worsening and were more fearful of movement.

The subjects were slightly more satisfied with a X-ray based diagnosis than a clinical diagnosis. This may reflect the common misconception that OA is caused by 'wear and tear' and the joint needs to be replaced.

The study's finding shows that it may be important to avoid unnecessary X-rays when diagnosing knee osteoarthritis. Changing this can be challenging, since many people still expect or want  X-ray imaging. If we can change this mindset, it will minimize unnecessary concern about joint damage, reduce demand for expensive and potentially unnecessary joint replacement surgery.

In my opinion, we as health professionals should not focus on joint 'wear and tear' since it can make patients more anxious about their conditions and concerned about damaging their joints. There are a range of non surgical, non invasive options that can reduce pain and improve your mobility. Exercise is one of many if you read this Cochrane review.

Our health minister says healthcare spending in Singapore could hit 30 billion a year by 2030 in a Straits Times article just 2 days ago. Perhaps this is an area where we need to be more mindful of unnecessary X-ray imaging and joint replacements to bring healthcare spending lower.

You can read about what actually causes your joints to wear out here if you are keen.

Reference

Lawford BJ, Bennell KL, Ewald D et al (2025). Effects Of X-ray-Based Diagnosis And explanation Of Knee Osteoarthritis On Patient Beliefs About Osteoarthritis management: A Randomised Clinical Trial. Plos One. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1004537 

Brain Myelin Levels Takes 2 Months To Recover After A Marathon

Picture from MSIF

I ran my first marathon when I was 16 years old, just after finishing my GCE 'O' levels. Despite not training as much as I would have liked, I finished in 4:00:16 hrs. If  I had ran just 17 seconds faster, I would have gone under 4 hours. 

I can still remember the exhaustion and agony I felt after the finishing line. I had willed myself to keep going despite hitting the proverbial wall and that led me to wonder about the brain's response to endurance exercise.

So I am not surprised that a recently published study shows that marathon running can cause a temporary reduction in brain myelin content. Full recovery only takes place after 2 months. Myelin is a fatty substance that covers and protects nerve fibers in the brain and spinal cord. It makes up 40 percent of the brain's white matter. The white matter is in charge of nerve signaling to enable learning, memory, sensory perception, motor control and cognition.

Other than allowing faster transmission of nerve impluses (which helps you move more quickly or learn with better focus), myelin helps convert glucose into energy for the brain. This is very important since so much energy is needed for all those nerve signals, especially when running a marathon.

Researchers used advanced MRI with multicomponent relaxometry to assess the myelin water fraction (MWF) to measure the amount of myelin in the brain. This was done on 10 runners ages 45 to 73,  both before and 48 hours after completing a marathon. 

They found substantial reduction in MWF in 12 areas of white matter after the race. The most significant reductions were observed in the pontine crossing (28%) and corticospinal tracts (26%). The affected areas are crucial for motor function and integrating sensory and emotional inputs, suggesting impact on movement and emotional regulation.

Since this was a small study, they did follow up scans 2 weeks after the marathon and 2 months after to track recovery.

MWF levels begin to rebound within 2 weeks and recovered fully to pre-race levels by 2 months. These findings suggest that brain myelin content is temporarily and reversibly diminished by severe exercise. Analyses of brain volume and hydration status showed that dehydration was not responsible for the changes in MWF. 

Since the brain and your legs are both competing for glucose while running a marathon, the brain turns to myelin lipids for energy. Previous studies have shown that lower brain myelin content is linked to cognitive decline - in areas related to verbal fluency and excutive function.

Should those of us who participate in endurance sports be concerned about myelin depletion in our brains? The authors say the breakdown of myelin from endurance exercise is actually beneficial, especially since it generates between 2 weeks to 2 months as it 'exercises' the brain's metabolic machinery.

Reduction in myelin levels can be similar to how muscles react to strength training. Your muscles break down as glycogen levels get depleted during weight training and endurance exercise before building back stronger with adequate rest. 

Better fueling with carbohydrates help sustain effort during training and races and may possibly reduce the amount of myelin used. Some runners in the research took carbohydrates during the marathon while others none, but there were no differences in this research. 

The authors did not investigate running speed. Perhaps running faster if underfueled may exacerbate brain myelin reduction.

So I was drawing on my myelin lipids to support my brain function in my maiden marathon and many times subsequently while exercising and competing for all those years. 

Can repeated depletion and restoration of myelin have long term consequences for people who frequently engage in prolonged, strenuous exercises and competitions?

The reversible nature of MWF is definitely reassuring (to me at least) and as I am still able to write an article for you readers weekly, I think all those hammer sessions and races definitely helped improve my brain function. 

I don't do those long, intense sessions much compared to before, but  I will make sure to have enough rest after. Make sure you do too.

Reference

Ramos-Cabrer P, Cabrera-Zubizarreta A, Padro D et al (2025).Reversible Reduction In Brain Myelin Content UponMarathon Running. Nat Metab. DOI: 10.1038/s42255-025-01244-7