Flat Feet And Overpronation

On Friday night, a patient sent me a message with pictures (above) regarding her daughter's flat feet. She was worried that it was affecting her knee, hip and lower back. Subsequently, she brought her daughter into the clinic to see me yesterday. 

Her daughter has increased her running and training more recently for her National School Games bowling competition in the first week of May. She just started having mild pain in her left foot on Friday. Because of the pain, my patient was worried about her daughter's "over" pronation. 

The readers following this blog will recall that I have written before that children from 11 months to 19 years old with flat feet are perfectly fine and do not need orthotics. You can view the Cochrane review here. 

"Over" pronation is a word that is often used by many healthcare professionals to tell their patients that it is a cause of their foot pain. However EVERYONE has to pronate when they walk or run. When you take a step forward while walking, you often land on your heels. After heel strike, the whole foot lands on the ground and this is when your foot pronates. Now imagine having insoles or orthotics to block that movement. That is what happens when you try to limit pronation.

This mechanism is very necessary otherwise no load will be distributed up the leg. In fact, it often does not cause issues in runners. And yet, patients are somehow steered and asked to avoid, limit or alter pronation at all cost.

Of course there may be occasions when you have pain in your foot or arch, and healthcare professionals may have to take the load off the area temporarily to alleviate the structures that have been irritated.

The following study by Nielsen et al (2013) published in the British Journal of Sports Medicine investigated whether newbie runners with different foot positions had more or less injuries by wearing a neutral shoe regardless of their foot type or mechanics.

The 927 newbie runners with different pronation types were followed for a period of 12 months. All the runners received the same pair of neutral running shoes regardless of whether they had neutral foot pronation or not.  

The runners accumulated a total of 163, 401 km that year. 252 runners suffered a running injury in that period. In addition, the number of injuries per 1,000 km of running was significantly lower among runners who under or over pronate than among those with neutral foot pronation.

The authors found "no risk that overpronation or underpronation can lead to running injuries through using neutral shoes for this special group of healthy beginners." The authors "compared runners with neutral foot pronation with the runners who pronate to varying degrees, and our findings suggest that overpronating runners do not have a higher risk of injury than anyone else."

The authors thought their findings were 'controversial', since it has been assumed for many years that one would risk injuries to run in shoes without the necessary support if you under or over pronate.

The study also found that the risk of injury was the same for all their runners after the first 250 km, irrespective of their pronation type. 

Note that the study did not look at what can happen if runners run in a pair of non neutral shoes nor did they investigate what runners should consider with respect to pronation and choice of shoe if they are already injured.

So as I explained to my patient and her daughter whose foot pain has gone away, that pronation or more accurately, overpronation is not to be feared.

References

Nielsen RO, Buist I, Parner T et al (2013). Foot Pronation Is Not Associated With Increased Injury Risk In Novice Runners Wearing A Neutral Shoe: A 1-Year Prospective Cohort Study. BJSM. DOI: 1136/bjsports-2013-092202.

How I Train My Breathing Muscles

My respiratory muscle trainer

Over the Easter weekend, my family and I were away in Lake Toba. Since I would be missing my regular Saturday ride, I brought along my inspiratory muscle trainer, so I could at least train my inspiratory muscles while away. I had previously written about training your breathing muscles.

I do not run with mine, just sit and breathe with it

There are different ways to train your breathing muscles. The 2 most common techniques are voluntary isocapnic hyperpnoea (VIH) and inspiratory pressure threshold loading (IPTL).

VIH involves breathing at high volumes and rates so it is similar to intense exercise while maintaining carbon dioxide at stable levels to avoid dizziness. It is primarily done using specialized devices like the Breathe Way Better device which allows you to rebreathe exhaled carbon dioxide from a bag. This creates a close loop to keep blood gas levels balanced when allowing you to strengthen your inspiratory muscles.

IPTL strengthens the breathing muscles using a device with a calibrated, spring-loaded valve like the Power Lung or the Power Breathe that requires a consistent force to open. Users breathe in forcefully through the mouth against this resistance. It creates a "threshold" that must be overcomed to be able to breathe in. That was the device that I brought along.

Where did I get this idea from? Thanks to Kowalski and colleagues (2023) who investigated 16 well trained triathletes (7 females, 9 males) for  6 weeks using the VIH or IPTL program with progressive overload. 

Both subjective and physiological responses were monitored across sessions. Blood markers, muscle oxygenation and cardiac indices were all measured before, during and after the training sessions to track adaptation and load.

The results show that both VIH and IPTL training increased physiological load. Blood gas analysis showed larger post respiratory muscle training differences in females compared to males. VIH induced smaller changes in blood gasometry compared to IPTL.

VIH produced higher subjective training load and perceived exertion compared to IPTL. IPTL caused greater metabolic stress, altering acid-base balance, elevated lactate and caused dizziness and headache.

The authors concluded that respiratory muscle training added measurable mental and physiological load in well trained triathletes. Usage of such training should be individualized depending on method and training context since this study suggests that the load (30 breaths twice a day) is significant enough to add to training load.

Even though the protocol is short and easy to fit into a training regime, my suggestion is to take it slow and use lower loads and progression to complement your regular training. 

Did it help my following Saturday ride after my Easter trip? I think it did. I fared better than I expected.

References

Kowalski T, Kasiak PS, Rebis K et al (2023). Respiratory Muscle Training Induces Additional Stress And Training Load In Well-Trained Triathletes - Randomized Controlled Trial. Frontiers in Physiology. 14: 1264265. DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2023.1264265

Farewell Physio Solutions

Thank you to our patients for supporting us through the years since we opened in 2007.

We bid goodbye to our first clinic, Physio Solutions, after 19 years at Singapore Shopping Centre. This space provided us with the opportunity to grow our patient base and train young physiotherapists. 

It gave us the space to learn how to manage a small clinic, allowing us to open a bigger second clinic in Amoy Street, 2 years later. It has been a great run and we could not have asked for more.

Will miss this room with a view

This year, when our lease came up for renewal, Gino and I decided to streamline and simplify now that we are in our 50s. We will both see our patients at our clinic in Holland Village, Sports Solutions, together with our team of physiotherapists.

Here’s to a new season of life!

To start with, it has been a nice change to be able to walk to work since April!

With the receptionists from the dental clinic next door

Being In Nature Helps

View of Lake Toba

I hope you are enjoying your Easter long weekend as you read this. My family and I are away this weekend in Lake Toba, in Medan, Indonesia

Last week, we discussed how being fit may protect us from depression and dementia. This past week I came across another article that shows how a 90 minute walk in nature also helps.

Pictures taken by walkers comparing their walks

In that study, participants who went on a 90 minute walk in nature reported lower levels of rumination. Rumination is the subjective, conscious recognition of dwelling on negative feelings, distress and their causes. It often links stress to depression and anxiety. Rumination is a know risk for mental illness.

These participants also showed reduced neural activity in an area of the brain linked to risk for mental illness compared to those who walked through an urban environment.

These results suggest that accessible areas in nature may be vital for mental health in our repidly urbanizing society.

Especially since more than 50 percent of  people live in urban areas. It is estimated that by 2050, this proportion will be 70 percent.

Not a cure-all to be in nature, but a good reminder that environment can shape mental well being. 

Reference

Bratman GN, Hamilton JP and Gross JJ (2015). Nature Experience Reduces Rumination And Subgenual Prefontal Cortex Activation. PNAS. 112(28): 8567-8572. DOI:10.1073/pnas.1510459112

That's our >90 min nature walk

Does Better Fitness Protect Us From Dementia And Depression?

I'm not a mental health expert. I only know that I always feel better after I run, cycle or do any other form of exercise. Especially if I've been particularly stressed about something or everything.

We know for sure that having good cardiorespiratory fitness is a strong indicator of overall physical  health. However, is someone with good cardiorespiratory fitness less likely to have mental health disorders or dementia later in life?

A newly published systematic review and meta-analysis provides new updates on this link across all age groups in their study (Diaz-Goni et al, 2026). 22 studies (out of 27 chosen) with 4,007,638 participants were studied in that review. 

The participants were between 18 and 64 years old, who had fitness measured at baseline and followed for 4 to 29 years. Different methods were used for measuring fitness. Some studies used VO2 max, others used indirect or submaximal exercise tests while others measured peak workload and exercise duration. Note that this paper talks about cardiorespiratory fitness and NOT about VO2 max values.

Higher cardiorespiratory fitness was associated with substantially lower future risk of depression, psychotic disorders and dementia. However it did not show to clearly help with anxiety.

Each 3.5 mL/kg/ min (or 1 MET) increase in cardiorespiratory fitness was associated with a 5 percent lower risk of depression and 19 percent lower risk of dementia.

Overall, those with higher cardiorespiratory fitness had a 36 percent lower risk of depression, 39 percent lower risk of dementia and 29 percent lower risk of psychotic disorders compared to those with lower fitness.

The authors discussed a few potential mechanisms that may explain why higher cardiorespiratory fitness helps mental or neurocognitive disorders.

From a physiological perspective, improved brain blood flow, vascular function induces structural, cellular and molecular adaptations to enhance neuroplasticity which then support cognitive and emotional regulation.

Exercise and higher cardiorespiratory fitness has been shown to help maintain the size/ volume of the hippocampus. The role of the hippocampus is linked to emotion regulation, memory and cognitive resilience. Atrophy of the hippocampus has been consistently linked to mental and cognitive disorders.

Mental health disorders and neurodegeneration are definitely complex and multifactorial. Please note that the authors also did not just conclude that "exercise is the answer". They concluded that higher cardiorespiratory fitness appears to be associated with a lower risk of several mental and neurocognitive disorders and cardiorespiratory fitness may be a useful marker to sort out groups at risk.

This is also interesting to note. Because only 1 or 2 studies were available, the authors were not able to study them as a group. Those individual studies suggested that higher fitness may be associated with lower risk of bipolar related disorders, dissociative, obsessive-compulsive and stressor-related disorders, sleep apnea as well as anxiety and ADHD in children. Depression in girls also appeared lower with higher fitness.

If the fitness influencers do pick up on this topic, I hope they do not simplify it by making it as easy as doing "some exercise or sports". 

So taken at face value, higher cardiorespiratory fitness seems to lower risk across a wide range of psychiatric and neurocognitive disorders. Do note that genetic predisposition, chronic pain, social support, smoking and diet are definitely confounding factors.

The evidence does continue to add up showing that higher cardiorespiratory fitness helps with physical disease and premature death, but also with better mental health, lower dementia risk and other mental disorders. 

Reference

Diaz-Goni V, Lopez-Gil JF, Rodriguez-Gutierrez E et al (2026). Cardiorespiratory Fitness And Risk Of Mental Disorders And Dementia: A Systematic Review And Meta-Analysis. Nat Mental Health. DOI: 10.1038/s44220-026-00599-4

New Strength Training Guidelines From ACSM

Earlier this month the American College of Sports Medicine (ACSM) revised its strength training guidelines for the first time since 2009. Needless to say there are plenty of changes after 17 years.

Especially since strength training is still treated like a recipe by many healthcare professionals. Sets, reps, rest periods, percentage of 1RM (rep max).

This new stand came from a review of 137 systematic reviews and data from more than 30,000 participants making it the most comprehensive evidenced based review on strength (or resistance) training prescription.

Strength training definitely works. It improves strength, power, hypertrophy, muscular endurance, walking speed, balance and daily tasks.

Also an update that many forms of strength training can be effective. Not just lifting weights in a gym, but also elastic bands, circuit training, home based and speed based training.

To improve strength, the evidence suggests that one needs to strength train at least 2 times a week using heavier loads. Exercise through a meaningful range of motion with 2-3 sets doing the key lifts (exercise) at the start of the session.

For hypertrophy, what matters most is doing enough work. High volume weekly, especially more than 10 sets per muscle group each week. Eccentric overload would be most effective to enhance growth.

If you are training for power, moderate loads of 20 to 70 percent of 1RM max moved fast with low to moderate volume are suggested. Olympic style lifting and power focused training seems to be most effective.

Just as interesting to note is what did not consistently matter. Time of muscle under tension, training to failure, equipment type, set structure, periodization and blood flow restriction did not consistently show improvement across the studies reviewed.

Surprised? The best strength training program is definitely not the most complex or complicated one. It is one that you can do consistently and progress reasonably and sensibly over time. And to be able to do it long term.

No need to obsess over set structure, exercise selection, home gym or public. There is no perfect strength training program, the results come from what you can do regularly over time and not what looks best on paper. Adherence is what helps you progress.

Reference

Currier BS, D'Souza AC, Singh MAF et al (2026). American College Of Sports Medicine Position Stand. Resistance Training Prescription For Muscle Function, Hypertrophy, And Physical Performance In Healthy Adults: An Overview Of Reviews. Med Sci Sports Ex. 58(4): 851-872. DOI: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000003897.

You can read the whole article here.

Should Runners Get Running Gait Analysis?

My patient who's training for a marathon came to me this past week telling me she had a friend who had just gone for a paid running gait analysis. Stride length, cadence, gait symmetry were all filmed after checking for muscle imbalance, flexibility and joint alignment. She was tempted to go too.

I shared with my patient a really interesting article I read this past week (Cochrum et al, 2021). The study assessed if running coaches could visually assess a long distance runner's running economy. These 121 running coaches were coaching high school runners to runners at international level.

Running economy was measured in 5 trained recreational runners at about 12.8 km/ hour. The runners were filmed from the front, side and rear while running on a treadmill. There was a minimum VO2 difference of 2 mL.kg/ min between adjacent runners that the coaches visually assessed.

The coaches viewed each video and ranked the runners on a scale from 1 (most economical) to 5 (least economical). They also completed a demographic questionnaire and listed running style biomechanical observations they used in determining each ranking. 

There was also a statistical algorithm to determine the effect of coaching level, years of coaching, training experience, competition level, certification status and educational level on the ability to accurately rank running economy.

Get ready for this, NONE of the coaches ranked them all correctly. Only 6 percent (or 7 out of 121 coaches) managed to identify 3 correctly.

In our clinics, we sometimes blame running economy (due to cadence, stride length, running style, gait) as a cause of problems or injuries. From the research paper, it is surprisingly difficult to judge visually.

Perhaps most runners do not have a "wrong" running style or form. Running mechanics are definitely self organized. As one trains more regularly, their body would gradually find the path of least resistance. The running style would then suit their anatomy and training load after accounting for their injury history, and strength. 

Much research suggests that runners often become more economical simply by running regularly, without needing to consciously change their running style and technique (Van Hooren et al, 2024)

Does this mean most runners do not need running gait correction? Since biomechanical measures did not reliably predict injury suggesting that we cannot so easily "see a risky/ wrong running gait" and fix it. 

Most healthcare professionals may disagree (since it means they cannot charge their patients more) and I would encourage you to pause and take a step back. Do not assume your running style is the problem however fancy these "advance" running gait analyses may promise. Especially if you are not injured.

I am also not saying running gait analysis is useless. It can be helpful when a runner is already injured. Small adjustments like shortening stride length, width or increasing cadence can easily help runners with knee pain and help them return to running more comfortably while the underlying tissue settles.

So, if you are a healthy, non injured runner looking to run faster or even prevent injuries, it's better to work on your strength, recovery, consistency, training load and progression. Your running style may not need correction. Your body would have already figured that out, especially if you are a serious runner with more than 5 years of consistent running.

I may look at and discuss running gait in our clinic as part of my assessment, but it is usually not a immediate area of concern. Personally I do not like looking at running gait on a treadmill since it will be different compared to running outside. I would get my patients to run outside while watching them if I need to.

Unfortunately there are many other healthcare professionals who do not understand this or choose not to understand (so they can make more money), to keep up with this misconception.

References

Cochrum RG, Conners RT, Caputo JL eyt al (2021). Visual Classification Of Running Economy By Distance Running Coaches. Eur J Sp Sci. 21(8): 1111-1118. DOI: 10.1080/17461391.2020.1824020

Van Hooren B, Jukic I, Cox M et L (2025). The Relationship Between Running Biomechanics And Running Economy: A Systematic Review And Meta-Analysis Of Observational Studies. Soorts Med. 54(5): 1269-1316. DOI: 10.1007/s40279-024-01997-3