No Need To Cool Down After Exercise?

Athletes, coaches and physical education teachers have always been told that an active cool down is more effective for promoting post exercise recovery than a passive cool down (no activity). This is assumed to allow for individuals to perform better during subsequent training sessions or competition and perhaps even lower the risk of injury. 

However, there is not much research on whether the above is true. I've written previously how it may be unnecessary to cool down after exercise. What if I say that in some cases an active cool down may even be harmful?

The most widely used post recovery exercise intervention is probably the active cool down. It is commonly referred to as the 'warm down'. This is usually a 5 to 15 minutes of low to moderate intensity exercises after exercise/ competition. Some will do a slow jog, cyclists often ride easy on the bike while it's attached to a stationary trainer.

The following review by Van Hooren and Peake (2018) compares the effects of various types of active cool downs with passive cool downs on sports performance, injuries, long term adaptive responses and markers of post exercise recovery.

Ready for the summary? 

The review shows that an active cool down helps lead to faster removal of lactate in blood. However the practical relevance of this finding is questionable since lactate is not necessarily removed faster from muscles. 

An active cool down can partially prevent the depression of circulating immune cell counts after exercise, although it is unknown if this leads to fewer infections and illnesses.

An active cool down can definitely result in a faster recovery of the cardiovascular and respiratory system after exercise/ competition, but it remains unknown if this reduces post exercise fainting and cardiovascular complications.

Active cool downs does NOT significantly reduce delayed onset of muscle soreness (DOMs) or improve the recovery of indirect markers of muscle damage. It does not significantly alter the recovery of neuromuscular and contractile properties of muscles, it does not improve range of motion of muscles, and does not reduce musculotendinous stiffness following exercise. It may even interfere with glycogen synthesis.

The review also provided evidence that an active cool down generally does not improve and may even negatively affect performance if the time between successive training sessions or competition is > 4 hours.

An active cool down also has no substantial effects on next day(s) sports performance although some beneficial effects have been reported. They do not prevent injuries and preliminary evidence suggests that performing regular cool downs do not reduce the long term adaptive response.

However, most individuals perceive an active cool down as being more beneficial than a passive cool down. The effectiveness of an active cool down may differ depending on each individual's preferences and beliefs. Some athletes may benefit more from an active cool down while others may prefer to perform no cool down at all.

Some general guidelines for those who still wish to perform an active cool down. It should involve aerobic activities performed at low to moderate intensities to increase blood flow, but prevent development of substantial additional fatigue. 

It should involve low to moderate impact to prevent additional muscular damage or DOMs. It should be shorter than 30 minutes to prevent substantial interference with glycogen resynthesis. So make sure you eat/ drink quickly after exercise or competition. 

Some evidence also suggest that an active cool down should involve the same muscles used in the preceding activity. Now you know.

Reference

Van Hooren B, Peake JM (2018). DO We Need A Cool-Down After Exercise? A Narrative Review Of The Psychophysiological Effects And The Effects On Performance, Injuries And The Long-Term Adaptive Response. Sports Med. 48:1575-1595. DOI: 10.1007/s40279-018-0916-2