Prominent barefoot running researcher Daniel Liberman published a key article three years ago showing a high percentage of forefoot strike in Kenyan runners who have grown up not wearing shoes, leading to conclusions that humans had evolved to be forefoot/ midfoot runners and not rearfoot strike runners. (Have a look here.).
This recent paper analysed another group of non running habitually barefoot Daasanach Kenyans and concluded the exact opposite of Liberman's research paper. Their study showed that 72% this particular tribe of Kenyans landed on their rearfoot while running at a self selected, comfortable pace. While running faster, the Kenyans (who are not known runners) in this study tend to land on their midfoot or forefoot. However at slower speeds (of 9:00 - 13:24 min per mile), 83% landed on their rear foot. At speeds fater than 5:21 min, rear foot landing was 43%.
Subjects in Hatela study |
One similar finding to the Liberman study was that a forefoot strike reduces impact loading.
This study concluded that many other factors like training level, running surfaces, running distance and frequency can influence preferred running style. They added that running speed is important as from an evolutionary perspective, we need to know how fast the cavemen ran to get food. Did they ran relatively long and slow or did they have to sprint and chase their prey while hunting.
References
Hatela KG, Dingwall HL et al (2013).Variation in Foot Strike Patterns during Running among Habitually Barefoot Populations. PLoS ONE 8(1): e52548. doi:10.1371/ journal.pone.0052548
Liberman DE, Venkadesan M et al. (2010). Foot Strike Patterns and Collision Forces in Habitually Barefoot versus Shod Runners. Nature. 463:531-535.
*Picture from Flickr
No comments:
Post a Comment